By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The rhetorical style is analytical, serious, and formal, focusing on the logical distinction between personal faith and the institution. Historical justification is employed, and emphasis is placed on the seriousness of the situation ("extremely regrettable"). The speech concludes with a specific political question regarding the steps to be taken following the passage of the law.

The rhetorical style is formal, critical, and direct, employing strong phrases such as "completely arbitrary" and "the answer to my question was anything but exhaustive." The speaker poses logical and procedural questions, focusing on the lack of policy coherence and the illogical separation of functions. The tone is skeptical and demanding.