By Plenary Sessions: Tiit Maran

The rhetorical style is analytical and interrogative, employing pointed questions to expose contradictions ("strange contradictions," "dissonance"). The tone is formal and critical, focusing on logical and procedural arguments rather than emotional appeals. The objective is to compel the presenter to clarify the substance of the decision and how it contrasts with the stated claims of utility.

The style is formal, structured, and analytical, relying heavily on the citation of legal acts and logical arguments. The tone is critical and concerned, especially regarding the loss of the environmental preservation aspect, but it is not emotional. The politician frequently poses challenging and detailed questions (a "vexing question") to highlight the substantive shortcomings of the government's plans.