By Plenary Sessions: Mart Maastik

The main opponent is the government and the Ministry of Climate (under the leadership of Andres Sutt), who are being criticized for financial inefficiency and market distortions. The criticism is based on policy and procedure, highlighting the waste of taxpayer money. The speaker vehemently rejects the prime minister's attempts to evade the issue, accusing him/her of diverting the conversation and leveling political accusations (references to EKREIKE).

The primary criticism targets the government and the minister, specifically faulting the procedural inefficiency and political bias involved in processing the draft legislation. The speaker suggests that the political parties currently in power are not interested in strengthening oversight because it concerns their supporters (platform service providers), which is why straightforward solutions are delayed for years.

The standoff is aimed at the government and ministers, criticizing their budget management, tax policy, and the administration of the healthcare system. The criticism is intense and focuses on the timing of fulfilling political promises at a time when national finances are running a deficit.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the government, especially the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister, who are being criticized for the budget deficit and controversial policies. The criticism is intense, focusing on policy failures and the government's broken promises (regarding cuts and wages).

The primary confrontation is directed at the government and the Minister of Finance, who are criticized for the irresponsibility of the budget and the inconsistency of the tax policy. The criticism is intense and includes both a political substantive issue (the deficit) and a personal attack concerning the minister's alleged coerced actions and inadequate public demeanor.

The primary opposition is directed at the minister and the government, who are being criticized for introducing the car tax, which is deemed unfair and ineffective. The criticism is politically motivated, accusing the government of seeking ways to boost their approval ratings instead of tackling genuine issues. Rather than showing a willingness to compromise, critics are demanding the complete abolition of the tax.