By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Läänemets
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2025-11-10
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is with the government and the prime minister, who are being criticized for the inconsistency of their tax policy and their negative attitude toward economic measures designed to support people's livelihood. The criticism is based on policy and analysis, specifically faulting them for failing to take responsive steps concerning the economy and people's ability to cope.
2025-11-06
XV Riigikogu, VI Session, Plenary Sitting
A strong backlash is directed at the prime minister, who is personally criticized as a failure and whose economic policy is deemed unsuccessful. The criticism is both policy-based (specifically concerning tax rationale) and personal (concerning the prime minister's credibility). The speaker also references the criticism leveled by other politicians (such as Mart Võrklaev) regarding financial logic to substantiate their own views.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main opponents are the government and the coalition, particularly the Minister of Justice, who is being criticized for disregarding the opinions of security and law enforcement agencies. The criticism is sharp and politically motivated, accusing the government of acting at the expense of the health of the Estonian people.
2025-11-05
15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Information Hour
The main opponent is the government and the Reform Party, who are sharply criticized for their inadequate economic rationale and for ignoring real-world problems. The criticism is intense, accusing the government of taking actions that lead to public disillusionment with democracy and the rise of extremist forces. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise.
2025-11-03
The 15th Riigikogu, 6th Session, Plenary Sitting
The main confrontation is with the government and the Reform Party, criticizing their tax policy and the strategy of the Minister of Finance (Jürgen Ligi) for completely botching the budget. The criticism is intense, focusing on political injustice and the government's irresponsibility, which stems from favoring the wealthiest. There is no sign of a willingness to compromise on this current issue; instead, a fundamental shift in policy choices is being demanded.