By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Läänemets

There is too little data.

There is no evidence of direct cooperation or a willingness to compromise. The speaker references the opinions of other critics (e.g., Mart Võrklaev) to validate their own views, demonstrating a readiness to rely even on critical voices from within government circles.

The speaker refers to actions taken during their party’s (the Social Democrats) previous time in government, when the Minister of Justice was given the opportunity to clarify matters by a government decision. With the current coalition, there is a complete lack of willingness to cooperate on this issue, as it constitutes a fundamental opposition.

Cooperation is absent; the speaker focuses on sharp criticism of the government and opposes the Prime Minister's positions. There are no references to bilateral cooperation or seeking compromise.

The speaker refers to previous cooperation in government, where the Social Democrats sought to balance the Reform Party's tax demands and prevent undue hardship for the people. In their current role in the opposition, the style of cooperation is confrontational, as they attempt to extract answers and solutions from the government, emphasizing that the government failed to consider alternative options.