By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar
Total Sessions: 5
Fully Profiled: 5
2024-12-18
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
The political position is strongly opposed to the amendments to the Medicines Act regarding the expansion of the hospital exemption. The speaker deems these relaxations premature and excessively liberal, emphasizing the necessity of strict regulations and clinical trials to guarantee patient safety. This position is based on policy and values, representing the stance of Eesti 200, which holds that the amendments will result in undue liberalism concerning the use of medicines that have not completed clinical trials.
2024-12-16
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The political focus is on blocking the influx of synthetic cannabinoids, which is being described as a "truly crazy" situation. As a solution, there is a strong emphasis on the need for joint European Union action to halt the illegal trade arriving in postal packages from China. The stance is heavily geared toward improving security and international control.
2024-12-11
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The most crucial topic is public health and vaccination, where the speaker adopts a strongly supportive position on mRNA vaccines, labeling them the success story of the COVID pandemic. This is a value-based stance aimed at persuading the public not to discontinue vaccination, stressing that there are insufficient grounds to do so.
2024-12-10
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary session
The speaker firmly backs the position that attendance during working hours is mandatory, treating this as an undeniable principle. His primary concern relates to the efficiency of the parliament's work organization and its control mechanisms. The position itself is focused more on effectiveness and procedures, underscoring the necessity of systematic oversight.
2024-12-05
15th Estonian Parliament, 4th session, plenary session.
The political stance strongly centers on the balance between children's rights and responsibilities, raising concerns that granting children the right to appeal or complain could lead to manipulation if accountability is not clearly defined. This position is cautious and prioritizes the practical implementation of the law, questioning whether "all aspects have been thoroughly considered." Furthermore, the speaker stresses the procedural focus of the session's agenda.