By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

There is no confrontation; the criticism is aimed rather at the uniformity of policy than at specific opponents.

The criticism is directed against systemic over-regulation and data protection rules that impede scientific research and medical education. Specific political opponents are not named; rather, the focus is on criticizing the broader regulatory environment, which is described as "grinding to a halt."

The criticism is aimed at the proponents of the draft legislation (the minister or the government) and the procedure that resulted in the creation of an overly voluminous and impractical law. The opposition is focused on policy and procedural matters, specifically highlighting the disproportionate scope and content of the law within the context of a civil crisis.

The criticism is directed at the actions of the absent rapporteur (Evelin Poolamets) and her parliamentary group, highlighting the procedural failure and lack of preparation. The speaker asks pointedly why the absence was not disclosed beforehand and demands an apology should the absence prove to be intentional.