By Plenary Sessions: Irja Lutsar

The rhetorical style is inquisitive and collaborative, addressing the fellow member directly ("Dear Riina!"). The speaker employs logical argumentation to stress the necessity of a personal approach, all while maintaining a formal, yet non-confrontational tone.

The style is direct, inquisitive, and concerned, addressing the Chancellor of Justice respectfully. The speaker employs logical argumentation, highlighting practical consequences (hindering the treatment of patients) and presenting their observations as supporting evidence. The tone is more academic-analytical than emotional.

The rhetorical style is formal (addressing the Minister and the Chairman), yet it is simultaneously concerned and focused on practical feasibility. Rhetorical questions and personal emotional expressions ("Lord save us") are employed to criticize the sheer bulk of the legislation. The speaker emphasizes a logical appeal, questioning whether it is even possible for a member of the Riigikogu to read through such a "pile."

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, expressing astonishment and impatience regarding procedural delays. The speaker uses logical and practical arguments (the existence of a mobile phone), demanding accountability and clarity. The tone is rather admonishing and demanding.