By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

Strong opposition is aimed at the governing coalition (the Reform Party and the Social Democrats), which is being criticized for deliberately delaying the processing of amendments to the Language Act. The criticism is severe, accusing the coalition of serving the interests of the company Bolt and allowing "massive circumvention of the law." There is no willingness to compromise, as the situation demands immediate action, not the production of analyses.

The primary opposition is aimed at the minister or a government representative, who stands accused of idealizing the attitudes of Russian citizens and providing an unrealistic assessment of the situation. The criticism itself is substantive and stems from a lack of confidence in the veracity of immigrants' responses during sociological polls.

The primary adversaries are the governing coalition (accused of failing to deliver on promises, lacking the ability to cooperate, and demonstrating fiscal irresponsibility), as well as the Tallinn city government and architects. Tallinn’s leadership faces sharp criticism for failing to understand the development needs of the national opera and for proposing irrational solutions. A compromise on the cultural project (the Estonia extension) is ruled out entirely, as the alternatives offered are deemed nonsensical.

The primary criticism is aimed at representatives of the Moscow Orthodox Church, particularly Patriarch Kirill, who are accused of failing to deliver a message of peace and ceasefire during the carnage taking place in Ukraine. The criticism is intense and morally driven, calling into question the Church's role during the conflict.