By Plenary Sessions: Tõnis Lukas

No direct confrontation is articulated, but criticism is aimed at an earlier funding change, which was an "unwelcome surprise" for other research and development institutions. The current focus is on clarifying the ministries' funding schemes, not on personal attacks.

The main opponents are members of the Riigikogu (Parliament), who are warning about the potential negative consequences of revoking voting rights, such as residents becoming enraged and turning against the state. The criticism is intense and politically charged, with opponents accusing the other side of essentially justifying anti-state activities. No willingness to compromise has been expressed; instead, they are demanding that the will of the majority of the people be implemented.

The criticism is directed at the speed and priorities of the government's actions, particularly concerning the drawn-out delay in establishing the defense industry park, which is framed as both procedural and results-based criticism. Quotes emphasizing the need for urgency, previously made by former government members (Kaja Kallas, Hanno Pevkur), are also brought up to highlight the current sluggish pace. Furthermore, there is opposition to the view that allocated funds should be spent solely on technology, stressing instead the crucial importance of people.

The primary criticism is directed at the Ministry of Education for the rushed nature of the reform, insufficient principles of stakeholder engagement, and communication that generates uncertainty. At the political level, the Reform Party is criticized for its role in stalling the Education Agreement bill, citing the lack of sign-off from Finance Minister Ligi. The criticism targets the substance and procedures of the policy, not the individuals involved.

The criticism targets the government's low level of credibility among the public, a problem presented as stemming directly from the government's own actions. This is performance-based criticism, demanding that the government take steps to restore trust, even though specific political opponents are not criticized by name.