By Plenary Sessions: Maris Lauri

There is no direct confrontation or personal criticism. The criticism is aimed at the procedural sluggishness and indecisiveness in adopting certain crucial financial solutions (such as a positive credit register and the supervision of credit and savings unions), which have been delayed for an unacceptably long time.

The targets of criticism are broad, encompassing the government, ministries, state agencies, and members of the Riigikogu who seek to increase spending or drag their feet on decision-making. The criticism is both policy-based (failure to cover costs) and behavior-based, accusing the opposing side of demagoguery, foolishness, and conduct that occasionally seems like "sabotage." The intensity of the attacks is high, raising suspicions of a lack of accountability.