By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The political focus is on implementing the rules governing the use of state budgetary funds and money received from privatization. The speaker moderately supports the position that a way should be found to pay the merger grant stipulated by law to the newly merged local governments. The question is aimed at clarifying the possibilities for policy implementation and financing.

The political position is fiercely opposed to the European Union budget proposal, which is viewed as a threat to the sovereignty and fiscal independence of member states. This stance is value-driven, highlighting the dangers of centralization and the linking of ideological conditions (such as the 'green frenzy' or LGBTX issues) to financial disbursements. The speaker pessimistically asserts that the budget is "one big bubble" and that the negotiations are leading nowhere.

The political position is highly critical of the government's actions, particularly concerning fiscal transparency (specifically, depreciation accounting) and amendments to the Planning Act. The speaker vigorously opposes proposals that restrict the public's ability to participate in planning processes, accusing the opposition (the Social Democrats/Sots) of suppressing public opinion. The focus is policy- and accountability-based, demanding clarification regarding budget figures and the practical implications of the legal amendments.

The political focus is on the critical analysis of the state budget and the financial position of the general government sector. The speaker questions the accuracy of the budget presentation, inquiring about the justification for excluding non-cash expenditures (such as depreciation) from the 2026 budget. The stance is strongly policy- and performance-based, centering on the demand for fiscal transparency.