By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The speaker is in strong opposition to the minister facing a no-confidence vote, criticizing both his lack of security clearance and his inaction regarding the relocation of Red Army infrastructure sites. Opposition is also expressed towards the political instability and ideological reversal (Centre Party members are turning into Social Democrats).

The opposition is directed at the government's tax policy and the car tax law, which is being criticized for unconstitutionality and poor legislative drafting. The criticism is intense and politically charged, highlighting the shift in the tax's purpose (from environmental protection to plugging budget holes). A compromise is ruled out because the law cannot be fixed simply by introducing amendments.

The main confrontation is directed against the prime ministerial candidate and the governing coalition, criticizing both the political substance (tax increases) and the procedural justification. The criticism is intense, questioning the existence of a mandate for implementing such taxes and calling the tax label "security tax" baffling.

The primary criticism is aimed at the coalition and the rapporteur, who stand accused of ramming through legislation that violates the constitution. The criticism is both procedural (the failure to consult the Constitutional Committee) and substantive (the actual opposition to the law). This opposition is intense and principled, ruling out support for the legislation in any shape or form.