By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

There is not enough data.

Economic perspectives are strongly opposed to tax hikes, especially given the three-year-long economic downturn. The argument is that tax increases won't actually boost state revenues, but will instead encourage people to use their ingenuity to optimize their incomes. The government's policy is being described as "taxing people into poverty."

The economic stance strongly opposes tax increases, particularly the rise in VAT, arguing that it is reflected in consumer prices and disproportionately affects lower-income individuals. It advocates for a fiscal policy that ensures citizens have sufficient funds to purchase food. Criticism is directed at the comprehensive tax package, which encompasses income tax, VAT, a car tax, and a sugar tax.

It expresses strong opposition to the introduction of the new tax obligation (the car tax), emphasizing that while money is needed, this does not justify taking measures that contravene the constitution. The economic viewpoints are framed primarily as legal and procedural criticism.