By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller

The main confrontation is aimed at the official facing a no-confidence motion and the individuals responsible for the falsified data that served as the basis for the distribution of 2.6 billion euros. The criticism is intense and demands the publication of names, signaling a call for individualized accountability.

The primary confrontation is aimed at the Prime Minister and the government, who are being criticized for failing to answer Mart Helme's questions and for their interpretation of the media coverage. Political criticism is intense, particularly concerning the financial feasibility of the green transition and the selection of energy sources.

The main opposition is directed against the proposal by the coalition (or the initiators of the bill) to retain voting rights for stateless persons in the constitution. The criticism is policy-driven and principled, arguing that the amendment is neither expedient nor necessary for the Estonian state. The opposition is intense because the speaker views the change as a long-term threat to Estonia’s future direction.

The criticism is directed at the actions of the government/coalition, particularly concerning the reduction of funding for hobby education and the freezing of funding for youth camps. Concern is also expressed regarding the hindering of entrepreneurship, which could reduce private sector contributions to sports. The criticism is policy- and budget-based, expressing skepticism about the coalition's actual capacity to govern.

There is no adversarial stance, as the speaker is asking the Minister of Defense clarifying questions regarding existing legislation and border management. The criticism is aimed more at the lack or ambiguity of political solutions, rather than at individuals.

The opposition is aimed at the proponent and the policy's supporters, who stand accused of misrepresenting data and prioritizing personal or ideological interests. The criticism is intense and includes allegations that the benefits are flowing into the pockets of specific companies and political parties, rather than reaching the Estonian people.

The confrontation is aimed at the leaders of three political parties who distributed 2.6 billion euros in subsidies for wind energy, along with the individual facing a motion of no confidence. The criticism is both political (the subsidies are deemed impractical) and ethical, accusing the opponents of using lies and hypocrisy to justify their stance on the issue of life expectancy in Ida-Virumaa.