By Plenary Sessions: Arvo Aller
Total Sessions: 7
Fully Profiled: 7
2025-02-27
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary sitting
Economic perspectives emphasize the transparency of state finances and responsible spending. The speaker criticizes the allocation of 2.6 billion euros based on unreliable data and demands genuine awareness of short-term energy market risks.
2025-02-26
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, press briefing
Economic views emphasize fiscal prudence, contrasting with the high cost of the green transition and deeming it too expensive for Estonia ('it is not affordable for us'). Criticism is also directed at the allocation of 2.6 billion euros, suggesting its inefficient use for energy production purposes.
2025-02-25
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
There is insufficient data. The speaker mentions that stateless persons have a constitutional right to work, but economic policy, taxation, or budget discipline are not addressed.
2025-02-20
15th Riigikogu, 5th sitting, plenary session.
The speaker supports increasing public spending on sports, coaches, and youth camps to ensure children remain active. However, he/she expresses concern that if business activities are "choked off," profits will fall and the contribution of private funding to sports will decrease, which is dangerous.
2025-02-19
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary sitting
There is no data available regarding economic standpoints.
2025-02-17
15th Estonian Parliament, 5th session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize fiscal responsibility and demand that the benefits derived from investments reach the Estonian people directly. The speaker is skeptical of large promised returns when the distribution of benefits is unclear and there is suspicion of unjust enrichment by ideologically driven companies.
2025-02-12
15th Riigikogu, 5th session, plenary session
Economic views emphasize a market-economy approach, standing in strong opposition to the €2.6 billion in state subsidies allocated to the energy sector. The speaker questions the rationale for subsidization when the energy is allegedly cheap, pointing to inefficient state spending.