Agenda Profile: Arvo Aller
Continuation of the second reading of the draft law amending the Child Protection Act and other laws (427 SE)
2024-12-03
15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting
Political Position
Strong opposition to Bill 427 SE, which concerns amendments to the Child Protection Act and the Penal Register Act, particularly regarding the replacement of the word "prohibition" with the word "restriction." The political stance is strongly values-driven, emphasizing the need to stand up for Estonian children and ensure that child abusers are prevented from working with children. The speaker positions their party (the Estonian Conservative People's Party) as the only one highlighting this crucial point.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrates detailed knowledge of specific sections (§ 1 p 11, § 20 subsection 4, § 2) of the Child Protection Act (LKS) and the Criminal Records Database Act, and their respective implications. It legally and precisely differentiates the concepts of "prohibition" and "restriction," and references procedural deadlines (60 days) and the role of the Social Insurance Board. Reference is made to a commissioned legal assessment that supported the objection, indicating a thorough, in-depth analysis of the legislative material.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is passionate, anxious, and confrontational, expressing great disappointment over the reintroduction of the bill in its identical form. Both logical arguments (the distinction between a ban and a restriction) and strong emotional appeals are employed, referencing "the madmen" and "moving on to the next crime scene." The speaker addresses colleagues as "fellow combatants" and calls upon Riigikogu members to vote against the law.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speeches relate to the continuation of the second reading of a specific draft act (427 SE) in the Riigikogu in December 2024. Reference is made to a previous debate where the Social Affairs Committee withdrew the bill, as well as to the submission of proposals for amendment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Criticism is aimed at the coalition, the Social Affairs Committee, and the ministry, accusing them of failing to look into the matter deeply and of forcing the ministry's views through a law firm. The procedural aspect is also criticized because the draft bill was brought back in the same form, despite substantive amendment proposals. The opposition is principled, as there are fears that the bill will open the doors to pedophiles.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Cooperation with party colleagues (Riina Solman and the Conservative People's Party of Estonia) in submitting amendments to improve the draft bill is emphasized. Disappointment is voiced over the coalition's failure to take these proposals into account, with the implication that the coalition is acting purely out of spite.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
Not enough data.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
A central social theme is child safety and the protection of children from individuals convicted of child abuse. There is a demand that pedophiles should not be allowed to work with children in Estonian childcare institutions or anywhere else, emphasizing that children of all ages must be protected and kept in a safe environment.
3 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The main legislative focus is on amendments to the Child Protection Act and the Criminal Records Act (Bill 427 SE). The speaker is a strong opponent of the bill's current wording, seeking to omit or amend provisions that replace "prohibition" with "restriction," in order to maintain a lifelong ban for child abusers.
3 Speeches Analyzed