By Plenary Sessions: Alar Laneman
Total Sessions: 3
Fully Profiled: 3
2024-09-25
15th Riigikogu, 4th sitting, plenary session
The criticism is aimed at the decision-making processes for national defense planning, where regional aspects are poorly represented. The actions of the Ministry of Defense in the Nursipalu case are cited as an example, where the ministry acted "as if alone," without sufficient regional support.
2024-09-16
The 15th Riigikogu, 4th session, plenary sitting.
There is no direct opposition; rather, critics point to the imbalance of the government's broad-based national defense action plan and the lack of focus on direct preparation for war. The criticism is policy-driven and aimed at improving the government's actions, noting that "not everyone is on board with this."
2024-09-11
Fifteenth Riigikogu, fourth session, plenary session
He does not express direct opposition to political opponents. He raises a question regarding the doubts that have emerged in the media concerning the procurement of supplies and the role of Estonia/NATO, directing the question to the minister for clarification.