By Plenary Sessions: Alar Laneman

The legislative focus is on scrutinizing the justification of state fees and administrative costs, and criticizing tax policy decisions that shape the economic environment. The speaker acts as an opponent of government policy, demanding greater substantive accountability regarding the functioning of the state and the fulfillment of its promises.

The legislative focus is currently centered on the strong opposition to Bill 344, which deals with the organization of elections. Beyond the substantive disagreement, the lack of transparency and the subjectivity inherent in the legislative procedure when handling proposed amendments are also being highlighted, with calls for objective criteria.

The focus is on defining the national sports strategy and ambitions (setting policy), rather than initiating or supporting specific legislative bills. The actor is rather in the role of a policy driver, demanding clear objectives.

The legislative focus is on revising national priorities and the budget in order to redirect resources away from green transition projects and into the development of national defense and civil defense infrastructure. A policy change is being demanded to accelerate the construction of shelters and border areas.

The main legislative priority is the submission of a draft resolution that would initiate the establishment of an independent, militarized border guard. The objective is to address the fragmentation in national defense planning and ensure that the capabilities required for border defense reside within a single agency, thereby avoiding issues related to the transfer of command during a crisis situation.