By Months: Alar Laneman

Thanks colleagues for their support of the missions and emphasizes the consensus decision made by the National Defence Committee regarding the final vote on the draft bill. Expresses openness to criticism concerning the list and format of the missions, but calls for a wise and constructive approach when resolving procedural disagreements. Works in coordination with the bill's representatives and the language editor.

The style of cooperation is consensual and pro-alliance, emphasizing international contributions alongside 23 European Union member states. Domestically, emphasis is placed on the consensual decisions made by the National Defence Committee and the Foreign Affairs Committee during the processing of the draft legislation, which points to successful cross-party collaboration.

The speaker is collaborative, acknowledging the work of the ministers and offering recommendations to improve the balance of the policy. He/She emphasizes the importance of cooperation and synergy, especially in the context of regional development, criticizing situations where the Ministry of Defence has had to act alone (the Nursipalu example).

The data is insufficient. (There are no references to cooperation with colleagues, seeking compromise, or cross-party activity.)

Insufficient data.

The cooperation style is pragmatic; the speaker values the substantive discussion at the committee level, noting that the debate was so in-depth it was difficult to conclude. At the same time, he/she demands greater synergy from the government and relevant agencies in ensuring comprehensive security to alleviate the concerns of reservists.