By Plenary Sessions: Lauri Laats

Parliamentary activity is characterized by active participation: the speaker refers to committee meetings and uses the minutes as supporting evidence. A reference is also found to the plenary session held on the same day (26.03.2025), which demonstrates regular involvement in both committees and full plenary sittings.

The speech is delivered within the context of the information hour (Q&A session); the speaker raises critical questions regarding previous decisions and refers back to earlier discussions. In the first address, the speaker actively presented questions and criticism, while in the second, they offered a concise, brief explanation and an apology. The speaker appears to be a regular participant in plenary sessions, consistently drawing attention to specific issues and accountability.

Not enough data

Three speeches presented concurrently during the same session demonstrate high levels of participation and sustained criticism; this highlights procedural deficiencies and the necessity for cooperation between the coalition and the opposition. He/She points to the inadequacy of the bill discussions and is considering seeking a pause and consensus, as well as rejecting the first reading. This connects with the consistent criticism directed at the specific clause and the overall procedure.

The description indicates strong parliamentary-semiotic engagement: participation in plenary sessions and committee work; regularly references the public and the media ("yesterday on the radio show"); emphasizes continuous day-to-day activity within the context of the opposition and draft legislation; emphasis on demanding government accountability.

The keynote address was delivered at the plenary session on March 11, 2025, which featured extensive debate and a Q&A session; the subsequent presentation from the critical side and a brief concluding remark addressed to the Prime Minister point to the consistent use of a single plan, rather than a diverse schedule of appearances.