By Plenary Sessions: Helmen Kütt

The first speaker indirectly criticizes the Free Party’s previous draft bill concerning support for disabled children, pointing out that it contained significant errors, particularly in the financial calculations. The second speaker sharply criticizes the stance that prioritizes the profits of foreign capital while leaving the pollution burden to the state, citing insufficient preparatory work and a clear lack of foresight.

The direct criticism is aimed at age-based polarization and discrimination, citing the media coverage of older drivers as an example. Instead of launching attacks against political opponents, a factual error made by colleague Lauri Laats regarding the history of increased benefits for children with disabilities is being corrected; this was more of a historical and procedural correction.

Insufficient data.