By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

Total Sessions: 5

Fully Profiled: 5

2024-04-17
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary sitting
The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, particularly concerning the actions of the commission that qualified the proposed amendments as insincere. Powerful historical analogies (KGB Captain Ilyashevich, a quote from Stalin) are employed to underscore the lack of trustworthiness. Logical argumentation (a detailed list of specific paragraphs and points) is combined with emotional appeal (by drawing associations with Russian political practice).
2024-04-16
15th Riigikogu, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The speech is analytical, formal, and cautionary, stressing the danger of financial crises. The style is logical, relying on historical facts and numerical data (e.g., the weight of an ounce, the rise in the price of gold). The speaker uses an urgent tone, calling for preparation for the "worst" financially, much like preparing for military security threats.
2024-04-10
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session
The style is formal, factual, and persuasive, centering on the legislative process and the protection of the results achieved. The speaker employs logical arguments, citing examples of the Kaitseliit's historical stability and its successful opposition to unreasonable proposals (such as the sale of the historical house). Furthermore, he expresses gratitude to the stakeholders while simultaneously and confidently defending the efficiency of the committee's work against any criticism.
2024-04-03
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd sitting, plenary session
The style is analytical, conceptual, and concerned, emphasizing systemic flaws in state governance and the security sector. The author uses logical arguments and historical examples (such as the 2019 visit to the Narva border guard station) to justify the necessity of rapid structural changes. The tone is serious and cautionary, directly referencing the terrorist attacks in Ukraine and by Hamas as examples of a shifting threat assessment.
2024-04-01
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session
The rhetorical style is formal, direct, and inquisitive, posing pointed questions to the minister regarding specific issues. The tone is one of concern and emphasizes the gravity of the security threats, drawing upon the data and authority provided by the Director General of the Security Police Board.