By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The political focus is on ensuring the reliability and security of e-voting. The speaker is strongly critical of the current system, citing its international isolation and drawing parallels with Russian practices. The stance is distinctly procedural and security-oriented, underscoring the fundamental necessity of transparency. The criticism targets the system's deficiencies rather than political values themselves.

The political stance is heavily focused on guaranteeing the nation's financial stability and security. The speaker supports the technical precious metals bill but utilizes this platform to urgently call for a substantial increase in Estonia's gold reserve (to 20–30 tons) to safeguard the country against a potential collapse of the financial system. Furthermore, he/she questions the validity of the "Estonia 2035" strategy, arguing that it no longer aligns with the current serious security and economic climate.

The political emphasis is heavily placed on national defense and safeguarding the autonomy of the Defence League (KL). The highest priority is considered to be the precise definition of the role of KL's collegiate central bodies within the law, ensuring the organization's stable development and independence from ministerial oversight. There is strong support for amending the Defence League Act, and this is viewed as the most crucial task for the current composition of the National Defence Committee. The political framework blends a policy-based approach (legal precision) with a value-based approach (the KL belongs to the people).

The political position heavily emphasizes national defense and the structural problems facing the border guard. The speaker views the merger of the Police and Border Guard Board (PPA) that occurred before 2014 as a mistake, resulting from a flawed threat assessment concerning Russia. He supports either restoring an independent border guard force or fully militarizing the PPA to guarantee border protection and readiness against hybrid threats. The focus is on conceptual and management issues at the national level.

The political focus is split between national security and historical justice. On the security front, the speaker expresses strong concern over the rise of Islamic extremism and the limited capacity of the Security Police Board (Kaitsepolitseiamet) to operate on two fronts. Furthermore, he demands action regarding the monuments and names of individuals involved in Soviet-era crimes (deportations), emphasizing a value-based approach to history.