By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

No data available.

The primary criticism is aimed at the government and decision-makers who have made "stupid mistakes" by rejecting bids from major manufacturers (e.g., Nammo) and opting for cheap foreign purchases instead. Criticism is also leveled against the subordinate position of the Commander of the Defense Forces, who simply has to swallow whatever he is handed. The criticism is policy- and strategy-based, not personal.

There is no direct criticism or opposition. The speaker is instead informing [us] about the resolution of the problem raised in the debate, while maintaining a neutral and informative tone.

The main criticism is directed at the presenter of the report (Hanno) and the quality of the Ministry of Defence's reporting. The criticism is procedural and policy-based, emphasizing that the presentation does not include any of the goals or lines of action outlined in the strategy. The opposition is intense and manifests in questioning the value of the strategy itself.

The main target of the opposition is the Government of the Republic and Prime Minister Kaja Kallas, from whom they are demanding answers regarding defense spending and the replenishment of reserves. The criticism is substantive, addressing deficiencies in defense capability and the government's readiness. Furthermore, they protested the stalling of the processing of substantive inquiries, citing procedural unfairness.