By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The opposition is directed against the position taken by the minister or the preceding speaker, who asserted that unborn children lack legal capacity. The critique is intense and fundamental, drawing a comparison between the opposing side's view and the dehumanizing practices of totalitarian regimes that declared entire groups of people legally incapacitated.

Insufficient data.

Direct political opponents are not criticized; instead, the focus is placed on previous defense policies that resulted in the reduction of the military. The primary opposition is directed against the activities of Russian intelligence organizations (FSB, GRU) and hybrid threats, which are viewed as a direct threat to Estonian national security. The speaker dismisses concerns that counter-intelligence operations might fall outside the control of the Security Police Board.

Insufficient data.

The opposition was aimed at the initial draft of the law, which was deemed unacceptable because of its fundamental content, as it could have allowed an entire religious organization to be declared terrorist. The criticism is aimed at the substance of the policy and its lack of clarity, not at individuals.