By Plenary Sessions: Leo Kunnas

The political position focuses on strong opposition to the concept of the legal incapacity of unborn children. The speaker frames their position on a value-based foundation, warning against arbitrary mass killing practices similar to those employed by totalitarian regimes. The position is intense and links legal definitions to historical crimes against humanity.

The political focus is directed towards the practical and regulatory steps required for launching strategic industries (such as the production of explosives). This position aims to support entrepreneurship in a sector characterized by high demand and significant profit potential. The framework is clearly policy- and procedure-centric, seeking answers regarding the simplest steps necessary to initiate production.

The political position strongly supports expanding the counter-intelligence capabilities of the defense forces, emphasizing this as a crucial step given the growth in the size of the military during wartime and the threat posed by Russian hybrid warfare. This is a firm, policy-driven stance focused on enhancing the effectiveness of national defense and guaranteeing security. The speaker points to previous defense policy (specifically the era of "affordable" national defense) as having been ineffective.

The political focus is currently centered on the future of the education network and the prospects of regional schools (Orava, Vastseliina, Räpina). A politician is submitting a question to the minister, seeking clarity on the government's plans, which highlights concerns regarding the survival of local educational institutions. This stance demands information and is driven by the worries of the local community.

The political focus centers on legislative clarity and religious freedom, particularly concerning the definition of terrorism, stressing that entire religious organizations cannot be declared terrorist. [The speaker/focus] strongly supports the transition of Orthodox Church congregations from the jurisdiction of the Moscow Patriarchate to that of the Patriarch of Constantinople, although acknowledging the secular limitations of the state. The speaker’s position is value-based, emphasizing constructiveness and clarity within the text of the law.