By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The rhetorical style is formal, respectful, and highly interrogative, addressing the minister with deference. The speaker employs a logical and detailed approach, focusing on the precise interpretation of the law's provisions and the practical consequences at the local level.

The style of speech is highly formal and respectful, addressing both the session chair and the presenter with deference. The rhetoric is purely logical and investigative, presenting concrete hypothetical examples to clarify the facts. Emotional or aggressive elements are absent; the emphasis is placed on acquiring knowledge ("I am simply asking for the sake of the facts").

The rhetorical style is argumentative and confrontational, using a simplifying analogy (transportation) to clarify its position. The tone is challenging, accusing opponents of self-contradiction and creating illusions. The speech concludes with a sharp, personal, and provocative question regarding the burning of the ID card.

The rhetorical style is formal, substantive, and focuses on the presentation of facts, which is typical of a commission rapporteur's address. Logical appeals are employed, and consensus is repeatedly cited to underscore the legitimacy of the decisions. The tone is sincere and explanatory, particularly when justifying the postponement of the entry into force deadline.