By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

There is a complete absence of any criticism or identification of opponents; the speaker is focused on asking the minister questions to obtain clarification. Not enough data

No data available

The opposition is aimed at those who view e-voting as a threat to democracy and question the system's reliability. The criticism is intense, accusing opponents of self-contradiction and creating the illusion that trust is somehow maximally high in countries that use paper ballots. Opponents are being provoked with a direct, personal question about their ID cards.

Insufficient data. The speeches contain no reference whatsoever to opponents or criticism; rather, they emphasize consensus and the lack of amendment proposals from the factions.