By Plenary Sessions: Urmas Kruuse

The criticism is aimed at a systemic failure concerning the physical preparation of young people, rather than specific political opponents or groups. The intensity of the criticism is moderate, but the problem is framed as a decades-long and disheartening phenomenon.

There is no direct confrontation with specific political opponents; criticism is aimed instead at procedural errors and inaccuracies in the legislative process, which emerged during the parallel consideration of two laws. The topic of providing free school meals is addressed neutrally as a purely political decision, to be discussed within the framework of the budget strategy.

The criticism is institutionally aimed at the culture of the Prosecutor's Office and the justice system regarding data leaks and inefficient, protracted investigations. The objection is procedural and performance-focused, not personal.

The primary criticism is directed at the "Isamaa" party concerning the dismantling of the second pension pillar. The criticism is intense and policy-driven, emphasizing the negative consequences of the reform in terms of financial literacy, based on the analysis provided by the Bank of Estonia.