Agenda Profile: Anastassia Kovalenko-Kõlvart
First Reading of the Draft Resolution of the Riigikogu "Making a Proposal to the Government of the Republic Regarding the Imposition of a Temporary Solidarity Tax on the Banking Sector" (367 OE)
2024-05-08
15th Riigikogu, 3rd session, plenary session.
Political Position
The most crucial topics are the rejection of the temporary solidarity tax on the banking sector and broader criticism of tax increases. He is strongly opposed to the government's plans and emphasizes that a one-time windfall profit tax on banks should not be implemented, suggesting a balanced approach to bank taxation as an alternative. The framing is policy-driven and value-based, focusing on legal certainty and equality.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
Demonstrable knowledge of macroeconomics: reference is made to IMF forecasts and factors influencing economic development (rising prices, job market evolution, budget deficit). A detailed analysis is presented, along with excellent attention paid to the impact of the budget deficit and tax policy on citizens and businesses.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The tone is critical and persuasively argumentative, drawing on notable examples (the bank tax, legal certainty, various tax hikes). It utilizes direct questions and an ethical/values framework to highlight the problem and advocate for change. It successfully blends emotional resonance with fact-based explanations.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
He/She delivered at least two speeches on the same day (2024-05-08), referencing the submission of a question to the Prime Minister and the subsequent analysis within the context of the draft legislation. They associate the audience and the procedural progress with continuous debate and criticism from the opposition.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
Strong opposition to the government’s tax policy. The core criticism centers on the introduction of various tax increases and the creation of inequality, coupled with the application of "double standards." This was pursued with significant intensity, focusing on arguments concerning legal certainty and equality, and arguing directly against the proposed bill.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
Not enough data
2 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
A critical stance regarding the government's proposed tax hikes emphasizes that increasing the tax burden, coupled with rising fines and state fees, will lead to inequality and growing impoverishment. It highlights the potential use of a bank tax as an alternative, along with the importance of a flexible budgetary framework. The text touches upon economic recovery in light of IMF forecasts, but its primary focus remains on reducing the burden on citizens and businesses.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
It emphasizes social justice and the impact on ordinary citizens; highlights the special state support intended for people with disabilities and large families, and the potential harm that tax changes could inflict upon these groups. It notes inequality and the impoverishment of the population as the primary concerns, and criticizes the increasing negative effect of burdens and tax hikes on people's quality of life.
2 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The focus is on the criticism and debate surrounding the first reading of Draft Bill 367 OE, expressing opposition to the government’s proposed plan and urging consideration of an alternative approach (a bank tax). It does not explicitly lay out concrete steps for cooperation or procedural action, but emphasizes the necessity of pursuing policies rooted in debate and the principles of legal certainty.
2 Speeches Analyzed