By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

The political stance focuses on the state taking a greater role in ensuring the sustainability of cultural life in rural areas. The speaker strongly emphasizes that maintaining the cultural system cannot rest solely on the shoulders of financially struggling local municipalities, as they lack the necessary resources and capacity to do so. This position is driven by concern over the decline of cultural life and demands concrete steps from the state to rectify the situation.

The political focus is on ensuring fair compensation for landowners, particularly in cases where property values decline due to the stricter regulation of protected areas. The speaker strongly objects to the state’s intention to avoid or reduce compensation, viewing this as an extremely unfair and fundamental issue rooted in values. This position prioritizes the protection of private property over the state’s environmental objectives.

The speaker strongly emphasizes the state of the economy, linking the need to support economic growth and curb inflation with ensuring a more equitable society and fair competition. This political position is values-based, standing in opposition to government actions that serve narrow business interests at the expense of broader public interests. The overall stance is fiercely adversarial to the government's current policies.

The speaker emphasizes the need to resolve systemic problems stemming from one political force's overly large mandate and the resulting arrogance. He strongly advocates for factoring the needs of people with disabilities and rural populations into legislation, prioritizing social justice over mere simplification. His framework is both results-oriented (the government's failure) and values-based (arrogance versus compassion).

The political platform strongly emphasizes fiscal responsibility and structural tax reforms. The speaker strongly advocates for the introduction of a progressive income tax to cover state budget deficits and fund strategic sectors. Although he dislikes the motor vehicle tax, he deems it reasonable in some form to cover essential expenditures, while simultaneously stressing the importance of responsibility. He sharply criticizes previous populist decisions that led the country into debt.

The political focus is centered on the fundamental reform of the car tax, taking a stance against both the current unfair structure and proposals for its complete abolition. There is an emphasis on the necessity of raising funds for national defense and infrastructure, coupled with criticism of populist politics and decades of deficit spending. These positions are strongly rooted in policy and values, highlighting the need for a more balanced perspective to ensure the state's long-term sustainability.