By Plenary Sessions: Anti Allas

Supports the necessary taxation and expenditures required to ensure the quality of public services, noting that funding is insufficient for national defense, education, and road construction. It criticizes right-wing policies that have failed to generate adequate resources through economic growth or provide a debt repayment plan. The party supports a tax policy that encourages fiscal prudence while remaining fair.

The economic outlook is strongly pro-business, focusing on shielding employers from the undue burden associated with managing the repayment of employees' personal loans. The goal is to reduce the administrative load and responsibility placed on companies regarding the management of employee debts.

Economic perspectives are critical of regulations that favor narrow business interests, as this results in higher prices for consumers. This stance emphasizes the necessity of protecting the Estonian people from long-term negative economic consequences and prioritizes consumer protection over corporate influence.

The speaker is a strong proponent of social redistribution, supporting a fair progressive income tax that would generate additional state revenue and contribute to balanced development. He/She emphasizes that higher earners (starting from 3,500 euros) must contribute slightly more. Furthermore, he/she expresses concern regarding the flexibility of the Employment Contracts Act, fearing that it could worsen the situation for employees in a weaker position.

Economic perspectives focus heavily on the effectiveness of competition rules to ensure low prices for consumers. This demonstrates support for market regulation and the utilization of administrative proceedings aimed at consumer protection and economic fairness.

Strongly supports changing the tax structure toward a fairer, classical progressive income tax, ensuring that wealthier individuals—such as those earning over 3,500 euros—contribute more. It opposes raising VAT and income tax, measures which hurt lower-income earners, and emphasizes the need to increase state revenues by supporting economic growth. It views the "tax hump" (maksuküür) as a major flaw that must be abolished.

Economic perspectives emphasize the necessity of reforming the tax structure to prevent the tax-exempt outflow of investments from Estonia, which has led the country into financial difficulties. The objective is to increase revenues to ensure the funding of public services.

The speaker is a strong proponent of progressive income taxation and social redistribution, arguing that high earners should contribute more to ensure the basic well-being of all citizens. He opposes the current tax structure, deeming it detrimental to economic growth and ineffective during times of crisis. Furthermore, he criticizes the tax breaks—specifically the reinstatement of the tax-free minimum—which primarily benefit high-income earners.

Economic perspectives focus on the role of state subsidies and expenditures in supporting the housing sector and reconstruction. Support is given for government intervention in improving the housing stock through subsidy schemes.

Economic perspectives emphasize fiscal discipline and budget transparency, sharply criticizing the practice of covering large and predictable expenses (such as public transport subsidies) using reserves. They demand that these costs be properly planned within the state budget to ensure parliamentary oversight.