By Months: Anti Allas

It supports the redistribution of income through tax policy, claiming that the abolition of the tax-free basic exemption for higher-income earners (over 4,000 euros) would help solve societal concerns. It emphasizes the need to improve the situation of the public sector workforce (police officers, border guards) through salary increases, which should come at the expense of earned profits.

Economic views are centered on social justice and redistribution, standing in sharp contrast to tax cuts aimed at high earners. We support reasonable taxation aimed at reducing national debt and covering underfunded sectors (national defense, road construction, and special care services). The registration fee should be significantly lower, with the emphasis placed instead on taxing luxury vehicles.

It strongly supports state intervention in the economy to ensure social justice. It demands an increase in the revenue base for local governments and the expansion of the equalization fund (dubbed "Robin Hood 2"). It is critical of the social damage caused by quick loans, advocating that the responsibility for debt recovery should remain solely with the lenders. It forcefully opposes the abolition of the tax hump, which it views as a tax giveaway to high-wage earners, preferring instead to channel those funds toward raising the salaries of frontline workers.

The speaker strongly supports economic redistribution and a progressive income tax (for those earning over 3,500 euros) in order to collect essential additional revenue for the state. He/She opposes the abolition of the tax exemption structure, which provides handouts to high earners, and criticizes the tax-free withdrawal of investments. He/She expresses concern about the dangers posed by the labor market flexibility law (the Employment Contracts Act) to vulnerable workers.

The speaker strongly supports progressive taxation ("fair graduated income tax") to cover the state's structural deficit and reduce inequality. He opposes raising the VAT, especially on foodstuffs. He criticizes the corporate income tax exemption when it facilitates the outflow of tax-free capital (such as buying real estate in warm countries) rather than being used to boost productivity.

The speaker is a strong proponent of the progressive income tax, proposing a model that would generate 800 million euros for the state while simultaneously allowing for an increase in the tax-free minimum. He criticizes the competition law being pushed through by the government, which, in his estimation, prioritizes the business interests of individual companies over the broader interests of society. He supports sensible plans for cutting bureaucracy that doesn't add any value.

Economic perspectives emphasize the need for targeted social support to alleviate financial hardship among low-wage earners, the unemployed, and other vulnerable groups. Furthermore, the sustainability of research and development is stressed through adequate compensation, and the economic interests of landowners are protected against illegal environmental restrictions.

Economic perspectives strongly advocate for the redistribution of income through a progressive income tax to ensure a fairer contribution to the state budget. They oppose raising the value-added tax (VAT), as this would worsen the financial situation of low-income individuals, and they support bolstering domestic energy production to stabilize prices.