Agenda Profile: Anti Allas
Second reading of the Draft Act on Amendments to the Land Tax Act (437 SE)
2024-06-12
15th Estonian Parliament, 3rd session, plenary session.
Political Position
The speaker strongly supports the role of the land tax as a crucial component of local government revenue bases, stressing that the issues stem from the regular land valuation that the state has failed to carry out for 21 years. He/She emphasizes the necessity of finding a balance and consensus on taxation within the community, while simultaneously cautioning against a tax increase that is too rapid and catastrophic. The political stance is firmly rooted in policy and solutions, demanding statesmanship.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Topic Expertise
The speaker demonstrates deep technical expertise in the field of land taxation, explaining its key components (taxable value, tax rate, growth limitation) and the impact of the legislative changes. They offer local governments practical, numerically substantiated recommendations on how to avoid a tax hike by lowering the tax rate. They have analyzed the tax rates of Estonian local governments and use specific examples (e.g., reducing the rate from 0.4% to 0.2%).
1 Speeches Analyzed
Rhetorical Style
The style is analytical and advisory, beginning with a critique of the demagoguery and populism present in the discussion. The speaker primarily uses logical arguments and technical explanations, focusing on practical solutions and legislative mechanisms. He concludes with a call for statesmanship, both in understanding the law and in planning local government expenditures.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Activity Patterns
The speaker highlights his activity as a member of the local government council and has analyzed the tax rates of Estonian municipalities. Data is lacking regarding the frequency or rhythm of his speeches in parliament.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Opposition Stance
The criticism is aimed at the state's previous inaction, which resulted in the failure to conduct regular land valuation over a period of 21 years, thereby creating a revenue base problem for local governments. He/She also indirectly criticizes those who employ demagoguery and populism in the discussion. He/She warns local governments against having excessive expectations that the land tax will be able to solve all problems.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Collaboration Style
The speaker emphasizes the importance of cooperation and compromise at the community level to reach an agreement regarding revenues and expenditures. He offers constructive recommendations to local governments for mitigating the tax increase, demonstrating a readiness to find solutions.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Regional Focus
The focus is clearly on local municipalities and ensuring the vitality of rural areas through the land tax. The speaker draws on their experience as a member of a municipal council and emphasizes that local governments do not seek the destruction of anything, but rather the influx of people.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Economic Views
It supports a strong revenue base and fiscal responsibility for local governments to prevent the accumulation of debt and the failure to deliver services. It warns against tax hikes that would significantly harm both business activity and people's livelihoods. He advocates for a balanced tax policy that secures revenue without being destructive.
1 Speeches Analyzed
Social Issues
Not enough data
1 Speeches Analyzed
Legislative Focus
The primary legislative focus is on the amendment to the Land Tax Act (437 SE), the adoption of which the speaker supports, while emphasizing the need for its statesmanlike implementation. The priority is ensuring that local municipalities use the new tax rate brackets responsibly to avoid an overly rapid tax increase.
1 Speeches Analyzed