By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The rhetorical style is analytical and centered on questions, demanding precise answers and justifications from the presenters. An emotional and critical tone is also employed, expressing "deep concern" to the chair of the session regarding the procedural mishandling and the lack of answers. The speaker maintains a formal demeanor and focuses on logical arguments and the correctness of the procedure.

The rhetorical style is critical and analytical, highlighting contradictions and paradoxes, such as the conflict between increasing the patient visit fee and freezing doctors' salaries. Concrete examples are employed (Vormsi Island, the duration of the economic downturn), and challenges are posed through rhetorical questions. The tone is formal, yet it also incorporates ironic comments (e.g., "the feeling toward Isamaa is warmer").

The style is sharply critical and incisive, emphasizing the crisis facing the Estonian economy and the rise of poverty. It employs both emotional appeals (the plight of the poor, the comparison to Haiti's mud cakes) and logical economic arguments (chain reaction, decline in purchasing power). The speaker uses irony, referencing the coalition members leaving the chamber to eat, and sharply criticizes the opposition.

The style is direct, matter-of-fact, and at times insistent, especially concerning the loss of human lives, which is treated as a serious concern. The speaker employs a formal, interrogative approach, posing questions to the minister to gain clarity regarding the policy's conclusions and future plans. They balance emotional concern (the loss of life) with fact-based arguments (statistical figures, the rationale for cost savings).