By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The criticism is aimed at the initiators of the constitutional amendments (calling their security considerations into question) and, specifically, the actions of the rapporteur and the session chair. Strong dissatisfaction is expressed regarding the procedures because substantive answers are not being provided to questions, leading to accusations that the rapporteur is forgetting the content of the questions themselves. The previous conduct of the "good colleague, the social democrat" is also mentioned critically.

The main opposition is directed at the Reform Party's policies, which are considered the direct cause of the economic recession. Criticism is also leveled against the presiding officer for inconsistent procedural practices, and against the government for mental health budget cuts and freezing doctors' salaries. The criticism is based on both policy and procedure.

The main opponent is the governing coalition, which is accused of driving the Estonian economy into a deadlock and taxing the poor (the pensioners' security tax). The Reform Party is particularly criticized for protecting banks from additional taxation, with Jürgen Ligi and Kaja Kallas being named. The criticism is intense and focuses both on political choices and procedural shortcomings (the absence of MPs).

The speaker is critical of the government's actions and the implementation of its policies, noting that the situation regarding overdose deaths has not improved in the interim. He/She calls into question the effectiveness of the Minister of Health's actions and disputes the economic justifications presented by the government (savings in Lüganuse). The criticism is policy- and procedure-based.