By Plenary Sessions: Andrei Korobeinik

The style is predominantly combative and critical, using economic arguments mixed with emotional appeals in defense of poorer and disabled people. The speaker uses irony and sarcasm, especially when joking about the 9-cent increase in benefits and asking for a 9-second break. Regarding procedural matters, the tone is demanding and detailed, challenging the chair's interpretations.

The rhetorical style is sharply critical and combative, employing strong negative phrasing when describing the coalition's activities (e.g., "a highly hypocritical approach," "a very clear violation of the law"). Both logical arguments (data on the economic recession, comparison of the magnitude of subsidies and taxes) and emotional appeals (the situation of disabled people and rural residents) are utilized.

The style is direct, interrogative, and corrective, beginning with a polite address before immediately moving to fact-checking. The speaker employs a logical appeal to refute the opposing party's claim, and concludes with a sharp question regarding the opposing side's political understanding. The tone is formal, yet confrontational.