By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The primary social concern is the protection of public health and the living environment during the construction of wind farms. Adequate studies are required regarding the health of humans and animals to identify potential harmful effects, such as infrasound, low-frequency noise, and electromagnetic radiation.

A social issue is mentioned within the context of digital inequality. This is cited as an argument for ending e-elections, as it points to broader societal problems.

The social focus is directed toward protecting large families and people with disabilities, who are treated unequally by law. It is emphasized that the state must ensure they receive special care, pursuant to Article 28 of the Constitution. An example given is that the tax on a seven-seater minivan—a necessity for large families—is many times higher than the tax imposed on some old, polluting car.

A strong focus is placed on social inequality, criticizing the proposed car tax as a financial punishment targeting large families and people with disabilities. The issue of human dignity is highlighted, given that the tax forces otherwise self-sufficient families to apply for social assistance.

The social aspect relates to involving citizens in national defense and valuing their prior service. The emphasis is on security and ensuring justice for those former conscripts who wish to contribute to national defense but have been forgotten by the system.

In social matters, the focus is on protecting large families and people with disabilities—groups that will be hit particularly hard by the car tax. The government is also being accused of infringing upon Article 28 of the Constitution and of general negligence. Furthermore, the discussion takes an ironic and critical look at the issue of gender identity changes among council members, calling the corresponding bill absurd and impractical.