By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The rhetorical style is critical and inquisitive, employing strong language (e.g., the "screwing over" of landowners). The speaker poses repeated rhetorical questions to highlight the Riigikogu majority's opposition to establishing an investigative committee and the media's silence. The tone is one of concern, urgently demanding that the problems be addressed.

The rhetorical style is critical and direct, presenting sharp questions to the minister and challenging the positive aspects of the proposed bills. Logical arguments are employed, focusing on the additional costs incurred by citizens and the resulting reduction in service accessibility, and rhetorical questions are posed regarding the policy's overall justification.

The style is critical and direct, accusing the minister of implausible optimism and a failure to answer specific questions. A strong, even apologetic phrase is used ("raking up old carcasses"), and the necessity of improving the culture of debate is emphasized. The tone is demanding and concerned.

The speaker's style is predominantly combative, direct, and forceful, using strong language such as "absurd" and "complete rubbish." He/She employs numerous logical appeals, drawing attention to procedural inconsistencies, but also incorporates emotional elements (solidarity with the silent protest) and sharp criticism aimed at the parliamentary leadership.