By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The speech is highly confrontational, accusatory, and demanding, repeatedly posing rhetorical questions to the minister as to why his values do not align with those of the public. The style is rather emotional and value-driven, employing strong metaphors ("abyss") and referencing specific controversial statements and data (ratings, 8,500 euros).

The rhetorical style is demanding and confrontational, particularly in the first address, where he criticizes the presenter for a lack of knowledge, stating: "don't talk about things you don't understand." The speaker focuses on logical argumentation and repeatedly insists on specific, documented evidence (justifications recorded by officials), rather than theoretical answers.

The rhetorical style is direct, forceful, and emotional, especially when addressing the ERJK issue, which is repeatedly characterized as "utterly nonsensical." Both logical arguments (tools for national defense) and emotional appeals to colleagues are employed to move the draft legislation forward.

The rhetorical style is demanding and critical, focused on exposing the government's inaction and demanding concrete steps. The speaker employs direct questions and emphasizes the necessity of moving from words to deeds, citing the failure to implement the coalition agreement. The tone is logical and policy-centered, rather than emotional.