By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The speaker adopts a strongly oppositional stance, focusing on an analysis of the minister's actions and values, and stressing that a wide chasm exists between the minister's values and those of the Estonian people. The political framework is heavily value-based and results-oriented, citing the low approval ratings of the minister and his party (3% and 10%). The main objections relate to the reduction of child benefits and controversial social positions.

The political focus is on data protection and the oversight of state officials’ activities, particularly concerning the justifications provided for accessing data from the PPA (Police and Border Guard Board) camera systems. The speaker adopts a strongly critical stance, highlighting the existence of practical issues within these data access justifications, citing the PPA’s own analysis. The focus is rather on performance-driven criticism, demanding concrete data regarding the behavior of these officials.

The political position is strongly oriented toward supporting national defense, stressing the need for a diverse toolkit, which includes allowing the use of anti-personnel mines for the country's defense. He/She is also critical of the current operations of the Committee for the Supervision of Party Financing (ERJK), having repeatedly described the situation as "completely absurd." These views are primarily value-driven (national defense) and results-driven (institutional inefficiency).

The political stance centers heavily on criticizing the government's inaction, particularly concerning promises outlined in the coalition agreement (specifically, larger road trains/trucks). The speaker pushes back against the idea that Estonia desperately needs large amounts of foreign labor, emphasizing instead that the country can cope by acting intelligently. The overall focus is on implementing results-based policy and boosting economic efficiency.