By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The climate warming narrative is viewed, in part, as a business operation ("sales pitch"). Economic perspectives are tied to resource utilization, recognizing the importance of the oil shale chemical products sector, but cautioning the state about environmental risks when seeking new revenue streams (phosphorite).

There is not enough data.

They strongly oppose new taxes (the Car Tax) and cuts to social benefits (child benefits). They argue that the tax system must take into account the needs of large families. Furthermore, they criticize the state's priority of earning revenue from foreign prisoners while continuing to operate prisons.

Economic perspectives emphasize the transparency surrounding the use of public funds and strict oversight of investments totaling billions. Critical sentiment is directed towards highly-paid executives whose management of major projects has failed, highlighting the necessity for improved performance.

The speaker is opposing the new tax (the motor vehicle tax), focusing on its potential unfairness and the administrative burden it would place on individuals. He emphasizes the need to protect citizens in situations where they might be required to pay the tax on property that has been stolen.

The speaker opposes taxes that lead to impoverishment (such as the car tax). He criticizes the government's spending priorities, specifically questioning why tens of millions are being subsidized to the profitable wind energy sector when funding cannot be secured for a school operating on a 1.6 million euro budget.

The speaker opposes the state's fiscal discipline (i.e., saving money) when it is achieved by transferring costs onto local municipalities. He emphasizes that the state's savings do not change anything financially; they merely shift the financial burden to the local government. This perspective prioritizes regional stability over centralized austerity measures.