By Plenary Sessions: Rene Kokk

The patterns of activity demonstrate active participation in plenary sessions by asking questions and following up on previous discussions, referring both to the legislative discussion from the previous day and the question posed by colleague Rain Epler. Furthermore, information disseminated through the press and media regarding state reserves is actively monitored.

The patterns of activity indicate active participation in the plenary session, where speeches include both procedural criticism directed at the government and the introduction and support of a specific bill. All appearances took place during the same session day.

The discussion was concentrated into a single plenary session day, focusing on infrastructure and tax issues. Reference was made to previous participation in the special committee session and pre-election debates, demonstrating continuous engagement with these topics. The speaker repeatedly raised questions regarding the status and financing of the Rail Baltic land acquisition.

The speaker was highly active during the session, submitting several draft amendments to the Income Tax Act and repeatedly participating in the question-and-answer round. He demonstrated a willingness to utilize procedural tools, such as requesting additional time, to ensure his message was conveyed. This pattern of activity suggests a focus on economic initiatives.

The speaker is active in the plenary session, giving several short interventions throughout the day, addressing both the Vice-Chair and the rapporteur. This indicates active participation in the debates on agenda items through questions and brief statements.

Not enough data

The data indicate a single instance of activity during the plenary session in January 2024, where two quick and specific questions were raised.

The data indicates activity during the plenary session, with two questions being raised on the same day regarding both tax policy and climate and industrial policy.