By Months: Rene Kokk

Total Months: 11

Fully Profiled: 11

All Categories Political Position Topic Expertise Rhetorical Style Activity Patterns Opposition Stance Collaboration Style Regional Focus Economic Views Social Issues Legislative Focus
12.2024

15 Speeches

Not enough data
Details View Details
11.2024

18 Speeches

The speaker emphasizes the need for cooperation with regional stakeholders (the Raplamaa Association of Local Governments) and demands the attendance of ministers at the meeting. In the Riigikogu hall, their style is rather demanding and confrontational, requiring answers and criticizing the coalition's passivity and low participation.
Details View Details
10.2024

24 Speeches

The speaker is active in the opposition, focusing on criticizing government bills and proposing their rejection on behalf of the EKRE faction. He calls on other MPs to "think with their head and heart" and halt the proposed legislation. There is no information regarding his willingness to cooperate with the ruling parties or other opposition factions.
Details View Details
09.2024

14 Speeches

Direct cooperation is not mentioned, but upon introducing the bill, hope is expressed that the coalition will engage and support the further processing of the legislation. Openness is expressed for discussing proposals during the legislative process.
Details View Details
07.2024

11 Speeches

The speeches reveal strong opposition to the government’s draft bills and include a demand that they be withdrawn from the proceedings, which suggests no willingness to compromise. There is no information regarding efforts to seek cooperation or cross-party support.
Details View Details
06.2024

9 Speeches

There is no information regarding cooperation with other political parties. However, emphasis is placed on the opposition's joint budget proposals (halting Rail Baltic, the tax wedge, the bank tax) to demonstrate that the opposition is offering solutions for improving the state budget situation.
Details View Details
05.2024

11 Speeches

A collaborative style is evident with opposition colleagues (e.g., Varro Vooglaid, Rain Epler, Leo Kunnas), with whom similar positions (bank tax, e-voting) and procedural criticism are shared. The speaker supports EKRE's previous bank tax bill and praises Varro Vooglaid's presentation on the topic of e-elections. When interacting with the coalition, the tone is demanding and uncompromising, insisting that the government resign.
Details View Details
04.2024

14 Speeches

The speaker is operating from the opposition but is making appeals to other political parties (such as Isamaa) to drop the car tax during coalition negotiations. He is seeking broad-based support for a bill that would increase the efficiency of the transport sector, and he calls on all members of parliament to vote against the car tax, regardless of their party affiliation.
Details View Details
03.2024

18 Speeches

Cooperation is primarily described in the context of supporting bills initiated by the opposition (EKRE), with an emphasis placed on consistency. The speaker calls for consensus regarding expense allowances and asks the Riigikogu Board to support the search for solutions, but acknowledges that the coalition is not interested in processing the opposition's draft legislation.
Details View Details
02.2024

15 Speeches

The working style is centered on opposition activity, involving the submission of interpellations and the support of bills favoring domestic production. This engagement is evident in the initiation of the bill restricting real estate and the formal submission of the inquiry. There is no direct expression of openness to compromise with the coalition; rather, the coalition's activities are sharply criticized.
Details View Details
01.2024

26 Speeches

The speaker cooperates with opposition colleagues (e.g., Varro, Kert Kingo, Rain Epler) and supports their initiatives, calling for an end to political squabbling when processing important draft legislation. He acknowledges colleagues who help clarify the ministers' responses but notes ironically that the coalition lacks interest in substantive debate.
Details View Details
Back to Profiling