By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

He/She sharply criticizes the government, arguing that it is failing to set an example for austerity and that no savings are evident within the ministries. The criticism is also directed at the Speaker of the Riigikogu (Parliament) and board members for their lack of consistency, demanding that they cut their own costs as well. The critique primarily concerns the absence of political consistency and transparency.

The speaker sharply criticizes the Social Democrats and their influence on the budget process, accusing them of creating a lack of transparency. He expresses strong opposition to the current government, particularly regarding the actions of the Ministry of Regional Affairs and Agriculture. The criticism is both political and procedural in nature.

Sharply criticizes the coalition, especially the Social Democrats and the Reform Party, accusing them of lying and breaking their election promises. It is claimed that Eesti 200 violated their campaign pledge concerning the car tax. The speaker stresses that coalition politicians "cannot be trusted" and cites examples of previous broken commitments. The opposition is principled and uncompromising.

Sharply criticizes the current government, accusing them of cutting social benefits and harming large families and pensioners. The criticism is policy-focused, centering on specific decisions such as the withdrawal of the 200-euro benefit and the removal of the Tervisekaasa documentation. No willingness to compromise is evident.

He sharply criticizes the Reform Party and the coalition, accusing them of breaking election promises and damaging the economy. He refers to the security tax as "a tax on the income tax exemption for high earners" and accuses the coalition partners of being "milked" by the Reform Party. He expresses particular criticism toward Eesti 200 and the Social Democrats.

The speaker criticizes the management of Eesti Energia for a lack of transparency and the prime minister for inaction regarding the issue of oil shale boilers. He expresses dissatisfaction that company executives fail to respond to inquiries submitted through law firms and make decisions without public competition.