By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The speaker is intensely criticizing the current government coalition, accusing them of breaking promises and pursuing flawed policies. The criticism is both policy-centric (tax increases) and procedural (disregarding the coalition agreement). They express a complete lack of confidence in the government and demand the rejection of the proposed bill.

He sharply criticizes the former deputy secretary-general, who, according to him, obstructed the development of wind farms early last decade. Criticism is also leveled against the former head of Elering, accusing him of misjudging the situation. The opposition is directed at specific individuals and their decisions, rather than general political forces.

The speaker offers moderate criticism of the current draft election bill, but avoids personally attacking anyone. They express concern about the potential for system abuse, citing specific instances of suspicious voting that occurred in nursing homes and pubs. The criticism is systemic, not personal.

Adopts a clearly oppositional stance regarding the government’s policies, criticizing both the sugar tax and the expenditures made by the Health Insurance Fund. It calls into question the effectiveness of these policies and the appropriateness of how the money is being spent. The group demands concrete answers and explanations, pointing to inadequate communication on the part of the government (the Minister of Finance, notably, was unable to respond).

He/She indirectly criticizes the current system for allocating cultural grants, and potentially the minister as well, but does so constructively by raising questions about the system's operation rather than leveling direct accusations.

He/She moderately criticizes the government for its lack of transparency, particularly noting the Health Insurance Fund's (Tervisekassa) council being kept in the dark about crucial decisions. Furthermore, he/she expresses strong opposition to the tax revenue issues plaguing the biofuel sector, demanding a level playing field for all market participants.

Fiercely critical of the current government, particularly regarding its IT policy and energy decisions. It accuses coalition politicians of making disastrous decisions that have resulted in billions in losses. The text employs a mocking tone ("coalition politicians enjoy being background dancers at parties there") and demands that responsibility be taken.

It consistently adopts a confrontational stance toward the governing coalition, accusing them of dishonesty and making unjust decisions. It specifically criticizes the Reform Party and Eesti 200 for failing to uphold their election promises. It further alleges that the coalition employs a "steamroller method" and disregards the opposition's views.