By Plenary Sessions: Aivar Kokk

The address fails to indicate a cooperative stance toward the current government. The speaker stresses the unity of the Isamaa faction and their past achievements while in coalition, but in the current situation, they are demonstrating clear confrontation. There is no indication of a willingness to compromise.

Commends the joint efforts of the 2019 government coalition (Isamaa, EKRE, Keskerakond) in eliminating barriers to the development of wind farms. It demonstrates openness to international cooperation in the energy sector, recommending the consideration of joint projects with neighboring states. It stresses the necessity of achieving consensus on energy policy matters.

The speaker respectfully addresses his colleagues ("Dear colleagues!") and puts forward constructive proposals for improving the system. He is not ruling out collaboration; rather, he seeks additions and amendments to the existing draft, demonstrating an openness to compromise.

Insufficient data makes it impossible to assess the collaboration style. Although the questioning approach is critical, it remains within the bounds of courtesy, utilizing formal address.

Addresses the Minister politely ("Dear Minister!") and refers to their previous statements, demonstrating respect and a desire for constructive dialogue on issues of cultural policy.

It emphasizes the necessity of cross-party cooperation in addressing economic problems, acknowledging the shared objectives of both the opposition and the coalition. It demonstrates a willingness for constructive dialogue by offering concrete solutions for boosting state revenues.

Demonstrates readiness for constructive cooperation, acknowledging positive initiatives ("the draft bill is on the right track"). Wishes the committees strength and perseverance, and offers specific amendments regarding the draft legislation. Stresses the necessity of a round table discussion on energy matters.

It shows no signs of willingness to cooperate with the governing coalition, instead emphasizing systematic opposition. It refers to prior cooperation with other political forces on economic issues, but in the current context, it demonstrates no readiness for compromise. It criticizes the work of the committees as unfair.