By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

Insufficient data. The speaker is acting as an impartial rapporteur, focusing on the consensus achieved in the committee and does not criticize any political group or opposing viewpoint.

The opposition's stance is directed at the initiators of the draft bill (the Center Party faction), whose proposal to form an investigative commission they consider premature while awaiting the international report. The criticism is aimed more at the timing and procedural expediency, rather than the political substance.

Insufficient data.

The criticism is aimed more at the political priority, where copyright issues appear to be more important to society than the future and good health of the Estonian language. Specific political opponents are not named, but the necessity of resolving the contradiction is emphasized.

The main adversary is the Moscow Patriarchate and its leadership, who are accused of being tools of a hostile state's special agents and of blessing the aggression. Criticism is also directed at colleagues in the Riigikogu who oppose the bill, calling their positions "stupid and cynical, if not outright malicious." The opposition is on a political and security-based level, not personal.