By Plenary Sessions: Ando Kiviberg

The political focus is on amendments to the Local Elections Act (KOVVS) and the Churches Act, which stem from the recent amendment of the Constitution. The speaker strongly supports the processing of Bill 544 and the establishment of necessary deadlines for the 2025 elections. His approach is primarily policy-based, focusing on ensuring legal continuity by removing outdated provisions (e.g., the voting rights of clergy). Support is also given to the temporary preservation of voting rights for stateless persons during the transition period.

The most critical issue is the reliability and security of e-voting, concerning which a draft resolution was initiated to establish an investigative commission. Kiviberg supports transparency and obtaining answers from experts, but he proposed delaying the handling of the bill until the results of the ODIHR report are available. His approach is primarily value-based (transparency) and procedural (waiting for the report).

The focus is on the legislative process of the bill concerning the appeal of visa refusal and an individual's right to attend the court proceedings. His/Her stance is directed toward ensuring a balance between constitutional rights and the security of the Schengen Area, emphasizing procedural correctness and the clarity of statutory provisions that would preclude the possibility of preemptive entry into the country. He/She supports the bill's continued consideration in the plenary session.

The politician strongly emphasizes the need to safeguard the future and vitality of the Estonian language and heritage culture within the context of digital advancements. He sees a sharp conflict between copyright issues and the development of the Estonian language on digital platforms. The political focus is value-based, stressing the priority of linguistic viability.

The political position is strongly aimed at protecting Estonia's national security, supporting a legislative amendment that would preclude the exploitation of religious organizations for inciting hatred. The stance is clearly value-based, emphasizing opposition to Russia's aggression in Ukraine and the role of the Moscow Patriarchate in blessing this aggression. The speaker frames the issue as a security question, not a restriction of religious freedom.